Supercoppa: Penilaian Pemain Inter Selepas Kekalahan

Wanagama

You need 4 min read

·

Post on Jan 07, 2025

53 visitor like this post

Share

Supercoppa: Penilaian Pemain Inter Selepas Kekalahan

The Supercoppa Italiana final ended in disappointment for Inter Milan, and the post-match analysis is dominated by individual performances. While the collective effort fell short against a dominant AC Milan, some players shone brighter than others. Let's delve into a detailed assessment of each Inter player's contribution in this heartbreaking loss.

Goalkeeper:

• André Onana (6/10): Onana had a relatively quiet game considering the scoreline, making a few crucial saves that prevented a larger defeat. However, he could do little about the goals, particularly the beautifully struck Giroud volley. While his distribution was generally accurate, he couldn't quite initiate the attacking plays Inter desperately needed. He needs more support from his defence in future games.

Defenders:

• Milan Škriniar (5.5/10): Škriniar, known for his strength and defensive prowess, had a difficult evening. He was often outpaced by the quick AC Milan attackers, and his passing accuracy was below his usual standards. He struggled to contain the movement of Leao, especially in the build up to crucial goals. Needs to rediscover his form quickly.

• Francesco Acerbi (5/10): Acerbi showed his experience in certain moments, winning important aerial duels. However, he also looked slightly vulnerable against the pace of AC Milan's attack. His positioning wasn't always optimal, leaving gaps that were exploited by the opposition. Improved communication with his defensive partners is crucial for future games.

• Alessandro Bastoni (6/10): Bastoni was perhaps Inter's most consistent defender on the night. While he couldn't prevent all of the goals, he displayed his usual composure on the ball and made some important tackles and interceptions. He showed his ability to make progressive passes from the back, but unfortunately his efforts weren't always rewarded.

• Denzel Dumfries (5.5/10): Dumfries' attacking contributions were limited, and he was often caught out of position defensively. He needs to provide more of a threat going forward and work on his defensive positioning. While his energy is undeniable, it often needs to be channeled more effectively. His crossing accuracy was also subpar.

Midfielders:

• Nicolò Barella (7/10): Barella, as always, was a tireless worker in midfield. His energy and determination were evident throughout the game, and he made several key tackles and interceptions. While his creative spark was often missing, his work rate was commendable and is a reason why he always manages to earn high ratings.

• Hakan Çalhanoğlu (6.5/10): Çalhanoğlu showed glimpses of his brilliance, delivering some dangerous set-pieces and creating a few opportunities for his teammates. His passing was generally accurate, but he could have been more decisive in the final third. Overall, a mixed performance, with moments of brilliance overshadowed by moments of inconclusiveness.

• Marcelo Brozović (6/10): Brozović, the anchor of Inter's midfield, struggled to exert his usual control over the game. AC Milan's midfielders were able to dictate the tempo more effectively, limiting Brozović's impact. He needs to regain his influence in the midfield battle to return to his best form. He showed flashes of quality in his passing but needs greater consistency.

• Henrikh Mkhitaryan (6/10): Mkhitaryan's experience and technical ability were valuable assets for Inter. His movement in the final third was sharp, and he created a few chances. However, he lacked the clinical edge needed to convert those chances into goals. His role in controlling the tempo of the midfield was a positive attribute.

Forwards:

• Lautaro Martínez (6/10): Lautaro was a constant threat throughout the game, showing his determination and work rate. His movement was excellent, but he lacked the finishing touch needed to make the difference. Despite facing a tightly packed defence, he still managed to create several opportunities for himself.

• Edin Džeko (5.5/10): Džeko’s hold-up play was decent, but he struggled to get into dangerous scoring positions consistently. He was largely isolated and lacked the support needed from his midfielders. While he provides a physical presence, his influence on the game was limited. He needs better service to be more effective.

Substitutes:

• Romelu Lukaku (5.5/10): Lukaku’s introduction couldn't turn the tide. While he showed his physicality, his touch let him down, and he couldn't make a significant impact. He needs more match sharpness.

• Roberto Gagliardini (N/A): Didn't have enough time to make a significant impact.

• Matteo Darmian (N/A): Didn't have enough time to make a significant impact.

Overall Analysis:

Inter's defeat in the Supercoppa wasn't due to a single catastrophic failure, but rather a combination of factors. The team’s defensive vulnerabilities, lack of creativity in midfield, and finishing woes in attack all played a significant role. While individual players had moments of brilliance, consistent performance across the team was lacking. The defeat highlights areas needing immediate improvement to maintain their competitiveness. This is a wake-up call for Inter, demanding a re-evaluation of their tactics and individual player form for the remainder of the season. A deeper analysis of the tactical approach is crucial, considering how easily AC Milan bypassed the Inter midfield. The lack of support for the strikers also needs to be addressed to maximize their goal-scoring potential. The road to recovery starts now.