Inter Gagal Supercoppa: Tinjauan Rating Pemain

Wanagama

You need 5 min read

·

Post on Jan 07, 2025

47 visitor like this post

Share

Inter Gagal Supercoppa: Tinjauan Rating Pemain

Inter Milan's defeat in the Supercoppa Italiana against rivals AC Milan has left a bitter taste, sparking intense debate and analysis amongst fans and pundits alike. While the final scoreline tells only part of the story, a deeper dive into individual player performances, using a rating system, offers a more nuanced understanding of the match. This detailed review assesses each key Inter player, assigning ratings based on their contributions throughout the game, considering both their strengths and weaknesses. This analysis will delve into the tactical decisions, individual errors, and overall team dynamics that contributed to Inter's loss.

Goalkeepers: Onana – 6.5/10

André Onana, while not directly responsible for the goals, couldn't prevent the crucial strikes from AC Milan. He made several decent saves, showcasing his agility and reflexes, particularly in the first half. However, he was slightly less commanding in dealing with crosses and high balls, areas where improvement is needed at this level of competition. His distribution was mostly accurate, but lacked the incisiveness to consistently launch quick counter-attacks. While not a disastrous performance, it fell short of the exceptional displays Inter fans have come to expect.

Defenders: A Critical Analysis

Skriniar – 6/10: Milan's attacking prowess tested Skriniar's defensive capabilities. While he demonstrated strength in some one-on-one situations, he occasionally struggled to track runners, leaving gaps in the defense. His passing accuracy was acceptable, but his contributions going forward were limited.

Acerbi – 5.5/10: Acerbi had a tougher night. He appeared somewhat sluggish, struggling to maintain pace with the dynamic AC Milan attackers. His positioning was questionable on several occasions, leading to defensive vulnerabilities. While he offered some aerial presence, his overall performance lacked the solidity needed against a strong opposition.

Bastoni – 6.5/10: Among the Inter defenders, Bastoni exhibited the most composure. He made several crucial interceptions and tackles, demonstrating his technical ability and defensive awareness. He also displayed his usual comfort on the ball, initiating attacks from the back with some precision passing. However, even his performance was slightly hampered by the overall defensive pressure.

Dumfries – 6/10: Dumfries’s offensive contributions were sporadic. While he showed flashes of his pace and crossing ability, he often lacked the final ball to create genuine scoring opportunities. Defensively, he was sometimes caught out of position, leaving gaps on the right flank.

Midfielders: Struggles in the Middle

Barella – 7/10: Barella, as always, was one of Inter's most energetic performers. His tireless running and combative style disrupted AC Milan's midfield play. His passing, though, lacked its usual sharp precision at times. He contributed significantly to the team's pressing but couldn't influence the game enough to change the outcome.

Calhanoglu – 6/10: Calhanoglu controlled the tempo of the game well in spells but lacked the killer passes to unlock the AC Milan defense. His set-piece delivery was below his usual high standard, failing to create any clear-cut chances for Inter's attackers. His influence waned as the game progressed.

Brozovic – 6.5/10: Brozovic provided a calming presence in midfield, dictating the tempo with his precise passing. He exhibited his trademark composure under pressure, maintaining possession effectively. However, he was unable to exert the same level of influence as in previous games, hampered perhaps by the overall intensity of the match.

Forwards: A Lack of Clinical Finishing

Lautaro Martinez – 7/10: Martinez worked tirelessly, leading the line with his characteristic intensity. He created chances and caused problems for the AC Milan defense. However, his finishing was off-target on several occasions, highlighting a lack of clinical edge. His commitment and work-rate remained consistent throughout.

Dzeko – 6/10: Dzeko’s movement and link-up play were useful, creating pockets of space for his teammates. His hold-up play was adequate but his contribution in terms of goals was missing. His influence on the game was less than expected given his experience and stature.

Substitutes: Impact and Analysis

The substitutes introduced by Inzaghi had a mixed impact. Some showed promise, offering a fresh perspective to the game, while others failed to significantly alter the trajectory of the match. A more detailed analysis of each substitute's brief appearance warrants separate discussion in subsequent articles.

Tactical Analysis and Overall Assessment

Inter's overall performance was characterized by defensive lapses and a lack of cutting edge in the final third. The team's midfield struggled to control the game effectively, allowing AC Milan to dictate the tempo at times. While individual players displayed moments of brilliance, a lack of cohesion and clinical finishing proved costly. Inzaghi’s tactical decisions will undoubtedly be subject to scrutiny. A more in-depth strategic review is necessary to fully dissect Inter's game plan and potential areas for improvement.

Conclusion: Lessons Learned and Future Outlook

Inter's defeat in the Supercoppa Italiana serves as a valuable lesson, highlighting areas needing attention. The team's defensive vulnerabilities, lack of clinical finishing, and midfield struggles demand urgent addressing. A thorough analysis of individual performances, coupled with a review of the overall tactical approach, will be crucial in helping Inter bounce back stronger and more prepared for future challenges. The upcoming Serie A matches will offer opportunities for improvement and the chance to prove their resilience and determination. The future of Inter's season will depend on their ability to learn from this setback and adapt their strategies accordingly. The players, coaching staff and the management must work collaboratively to address the issues raised by this loss and strive for better results in the coming fixtures. The road to redemption requires introspection, diligent work, and unwavering commitment.