Tottenham Vs Chelsea: Rating Pemain

Wanagama

You need 5 min read

·

Post on Dec 09, 2024

35 visitor like this post

Share

Tottenham vs Chelsea: Player Ratings - A Comprehensive Review

The North London derby is always a fiery affair, but the recent Tottenham vs Chelsea match was particularly intense. Both teams displayed moments of brilliance and frustrating lapses, resulting in a game that kept fans on the edge of their seats until the final whistle. This detailed analysis provides player ratings for both Tottenham Hotspur and Chelsea, offering a comprehensive breakdown of individual performances and their impact on the match outcome.

Tottenham Hotspur Player Ratings

Tottenham's performance was a mixed bag, showcasing flashes of attacking prowess but ultimately lacking consistency defensively.

Harry Kane (8.5/10): The captain led by example, his tireless work-rate and clinical finishing were crucial. His goal was a testament to his composure and quality, showcasing his ability to find the back of the net even under immense pressure. Key passes and hold-up play were also noteworthy aspects of his performance. His leadership on the pitch was undeniable.

Son Heung-min (7.5/10): While not on the scoresheet, Son's pace and dribbling ability consistently troubled the Chelsea defense. He created several scoring chances, demonstrating his tireless efforts to contribute offensively. A slightly less impactful game than usual, but still a significant contribution to Tottenham's attack.

Dejan Kulusevski (7.0/10): Kulusevski provided width and creativity down the right flank. His crosses were often dangerous and he showed good link-up play with Kane. He needs to improve his final ball, but his overall contribution was positive. His energy and work rate were crucial in stretching the Chelsea defense.

Pierre-Emile Højbjerg (7.0/10): A solid performance in midfield, Højbjerg displayed his usual combative style, winning back possession and distributing the ball effectively. His tactical discipline was evident throughout the game, helping to maintain shape and provide defensive stability. However, he could have been more adventurous with his passing in the final third.

Rodrigo Bentancur (6.5/10): Bentancur worked tirelessly in the midfield battle, showcasing his strength and tenacity. However, his passing accuracy could have been improved, and he occasionally lost possession in dangerous areas. A decent performance overall, but he needs to be more precise with his distribution to enhance his impact.

Oliver Skipp (6.0/10): Skipp provided defensive solidity in midfield, breaking up play and winning back possession. However, he lacked the creativity of his midfield partners and struggled to dictate the tempo of the game. A dependable performer, but his contribution was limited in terms of offensive creativity.

Ivan Perišić (6.5/10): Perišić's experience and defensive contributions were valuable assets. His crosses were decent, but he lacked the cutting edge in the final third. He worked tirelessly, defending well and supporting attacks but needs to improve his final product to maximize his effectiveness.

Cristian Romero (6.0/10): Romero had a mixed game. While displaying his usual aggressive tackling and strength, he also made some rash challenges that risked giving away penalties. He needs to be more disciplined in his tackling to avoid unnecessary fouls.

Eric Dier (6.5/10): Dier provided a steady presence in defense, but occasionally struggled to deal with Chelsea's pacey attackers. His aerial presence was a strength, winning important headers. However, he needs to improve his agility when dealing with quick attacking players.

Ben Davies (6.0/10): Davies offered defensive stability on the left side of the defense, but lacked the attacking prowess of his teammate on the opposite flank. A dependable performance, but his contribution was primarily focused on defending.

Hugo Lloris (7.0/10): Lloris made some important saves, showcasing his shot-stopping ability. His commanding presence in the box was reassuring for his defense. He performed admirably considering the pressure put upon him.

Chelsea Player Ratings

Chelsea's performance was characterized by periods of dominance interspersed with moments of vulnerability. Their attacking prowess was evident, but defensive frailties cost them.

Raheem Sterling (7.5/10): Sterling's pace and trickery caused problems for the Tottenham defense. His movement was intelligent and he created a number of chances. Although he didn't score, his influence was significant.

Kai Havertz (7.0/10): Havertz showed glimpses of his talent, but his finishing let him down on several occasions. His movement was intelligent, and he contributed positively to the build-up play. However, he must improve his clinical edge in front of goal.

Mason Mount (6.5/10): Mount showed moments of brilliance with his dribbling and passing, but his overall influence was inconsistent. He worked hard but lacked the decisive impact expected of him.

Conor Gallagher (6.0/10): Gallagher put in a committed shift, but his passing accuracy was sometimes lacking. He showed energy but needs more composure in his decision-making.

Enzo Fernández (7.5/10): Fernández was arguably Chelsea's best player, showing his composure and passing ability. His vision and ability to dictate play were impressive. A highly promising addition to the Chelsea squad.

Reece James (7.0/10): James offered attacking impetus from right-back. His crossing and passing were dangerous, adding creativity to Chelsea’s attack. However, he needs to focus on his defensive duties.

Ben Chilwell (6.5/10): Chilwell provided good support in attack, but his defensive contributions were inconsistent. He offered some attacking impetus, but he needs to be more solid defensively.

Wesley Fofana (6.0/10): Fofana struggled at times to deal with Tottenham's attacking threats. While he displayed strength in the air, he needs more consistency in his positioning and tackling.

Thiago Silva (7.0/10): Despite his age, Thiago Silva showed his experience and composure. His leadership and organization at the back were crucial, preventing several dangerous Tottenham attacks. A class act.

Kalidou Koulibaly (6.0/10): Koulibaly had a mixed game, sometimes looking strong and composed and sometimes vulnerable. He needs to maintain a more consistent level of performance.

Kepa Arrizabalaga (6.5/10): Kepa made some good saves, but he could have done better on at least one of the goals conceded. A solid performance, but with room for improvement.

Conclusion

The Tottenham vs Chelsea match was a thrilling encounter, showcasing the attacking talents and defensive frailties of both teams. Both managers will undoubtedly have areas to address based on these individual performances. While some players delivered standout performances, others need to raise their game to consistently challenge for top spots in the Premier League. This analysis provides a fair assessment, but the overall impact of each player is subjective and open to further discussion.