Rating Pemain: Tottenham Menentang Chelsea

Wanagama

You need 6 min read

·

Post on Dec 09, 2024

42 visitor like this post

Share

Rating Pemain: Tottenham Hotspur vs Chelsea – Analisis Pertandingan Sengit London Derby

The North London derby between Tottenham Hotspur and Chelsea is always a fiery affair, a clash of styles and ambitions that rarely disappoints. This particular match was no exception, a rollercoaster of emotions and tactical battles that left fans on the edge of their seats. Let's delve into a detailed player rating analysis, dissecting individual performances and contributions to the final result.

Tottenham Hotspur Player Ratings

Harry Kane (8.5/10): The captain led by example, showcasing his unmatched clinical finishing. His movement was impeccable, constantly finding pockets of space and troubling the Chelsea defense. While he didn't bag a hat-trick, his goal was crucial and his overall impact was undeniable. Key Strengths: Positioning, finishing, link-up play. Areas for Improvement: Could have been more involved in the build-up play at times.

Heung-min Son (7.5/10): Son's pace and trickery caused havoc down the flank. While he didn't find the back of the net, his tireless runs and clever passes created several opportunities for his teammates. His work rate was exceptional, constantly pressing and harassing the Chelsea defense. Key Strengths: Pace, dribbling, work rate. Areas for Improvement: Could improve his decision-making in the final third.

Dejan Kulusevski (7.0/10): Kulusevski provided a constant threat down the right wing, offering excellent support to Kane and Son. His crosses were dangerous, and his link-up play was fluid and effective. He displayed his tactical awareness by tracking back defensively when necessary. Key Strengths: Crossing, dribbling, defensive work rate. Areas for Improvement: Final ball could be more precise at times.

Pierre-Emile Højbjerg (7.5/10): The midfield engine, Højbjerg controlled the tempo of the game effectively. His tackles were timely, and his distribution was accurate. He displayed his leadership qualities, organizing the midfield and shielding the defense. Key Strengths: Tackling, passing, leadership. Areas for Improvement: Could have been more adventurous in his passing at times.

Rodrigo Bentancur (7.0/10): Bentancur provided a solid presence in midfield, offering support to Højbjerg and contributing to the team's defensive solidity. His passing was crisp, and he showed good composure under pressure. Key Strengths: Passing, tackling, composure. Areas for Improvement: Could be more aggressive in winning back possession.

Ivan Perišić (7.0/10): Perišić was a constant threat down the left wing, offering a combination of defensive solidity and attacking prowess. His crosses were accurate, and his defensive contributions were invaluable. Key Strengths: Crossing, defensive awareness, stamina. Areas for Improvement: Could improve his end product in the attacking third.

Cristian Romero (8.0/10): A rock at the back, Romero was imperious in his defensive duties. His tackling was strong, his heading was excellent, and his overall defensive presence was commanding. Key Strengths: Tackling, heading, aerial dominance. Areas for Improvement: Could improve his discipline to avoid unnecessary fouls.

Eric Dier (7.5/10): Dier provided a calm and collected presence in defense. His passing from the back was accurate, and he displayed his experience in dealing with Chelsea's attacking threats. Key Strengths: Passing, composure, experience. Areas for Improvement: Could be more proactive in intercepting passes.

Ben Davies (7.0/10): Davies provided a solid defensive performance, offering support to Romero and Dier. His passing was reliable, and he displayed his defensive awareness. Key Strengths: Defensive awareness, passing, composure. Areas for Improvement: Could be more aggressive in winning aerial duels.

Emerson Royal (6.5/10): Royal provided solid defensive cover down the right flank, tracking back diligently and winning several important tackles. His attacking contribution was limited, but his defensive work was crucial. Key Strengths: Defensive work rate, tackling. Areas for Improvement: Needs to improve his attacking output.

Hugo Lloris (7.0/10): Lloris made some crucial saves to keep Tottenham in the game. His shot-stopping was excellent, and his command of the penalty area was strong. Key Strengths: Shot-stopping, command of area. Areas for Improvement: Could improve his distribution.

Chelsea Player Ratings

Kepa Arrizabalaga (6.0/10): Kepa made some decent saves but couldn't prevent Tottenham from scoring. His distribution could have been better, and he seemed somewhat hesitant at times. Key Strengths: Reflex saves. Areas for Improvement: Distribution, decision-making.

Reece James (7.0/10): James was a constant threat down the right flank, offering both attacking and defensive prowess. His crosses were dangerous, and his defensive work rate was commendable. Key Strengths: Crossing, pace, defensive work rate. Areas for Improvement: Final ball consistency.

Thiago Silva (7.5/10): Silva, as ever, displayed his class and experience, commanding the backline with authority. His passing was crisp, and his reading of the game was exceptional. Key Strengths: Passing, leadership, reading of the game. Areas for Improvement: Pace at times is a challenge against quicker attackers.

Wesley Fofana (6.5/10): Fofana had a mixed game, showing glimpses of his potential but also making some errors. He displayed his strength and pace, but needs to improve his consistency. Key Strengths: Pace, strength. Areas for Improvement: Consistency, decision-making.

Ben Chilwell (6.0/10): Chilwell's attacking contributions were limited, and he struggled to contain the threat posed by Tottenham's right flank. Key Strengths: Pace. Areas for Improvement: Defensive solidity, attacking output.

Enzo Fernández (7.5/10): Fernández was a calming influence in midfield, showcasing his technical ability and distribution. His passing was accurate, and he controlled the tempo of the game effectively. Key Strengths: Passing, composure, technical ability. Areas for Improvement: Could be more aggressive in winning back possession.

Mason Mount (6.5/10): Mount worked tirelessly but lacked the final product. His passing was accurate at times but he failed to create enough chances. Key Strengths: Work rate, passing. Areas for Improvement: Creativity, final ball.

Conor Gallagher (6.0/10): Gallagher put in a decent shift but lacked the creativity to unlock Tottenham's defense. His energy was evident but his impact on the game was limited. Key Strengths: Energy, tackling. Areas for Improvement: Creativity, decision-making.

Raheem Sterling (6.5/10): Sterling's pace and trickery caused Tottenham some problems, but he lacked the clinical edge to convert his chances. Key Strengths: Pace, dribbling. Areas for Improvement: Finishing, decision-making.

Mykhailo Mudryk (6.0/10): Mudryk showed glimpses of his talent but ultimately failed to make a significant impact on the game. He needs time to adapt to the Premier League. Key Strengths: Pace, dribbling. Areas for Improvement: Consistency, decision-making.

Kai Havertz (6.0/10): Havertz struggled to find his rhythm and influence the game significantly. His movement was often predictable, and he failed to create many chances. Key Strengths: Aerial ability. Areas for Improvement: Movement, creativity.

Conclusion: A Tightly Contested Match

The Tottenham vs. Chelsea match was a closely fought contest, with both teams showcasing moments of brilliance and vulnerability. The individual player ratings reflect the ebb and flow of the game, highlighting areas of strength and areas needing improvement for both squads. Ultimately, the result hinged on individual moments of brilliance and tactical adjustments made throughout the match. This analysis provides a granular view of the players' contributions and provides valuable insights into their performances. The London derby continues to deliver gripping encounters, and this match was no exception.